En un mitin convocado en Nüremberg en 1936 Hitler afirmó que “ir contra la unidad espiritual y racial de Europa, es un atentado contra la razón” y ya se sabe que la política nazi es la puesta en marcha de la razón pura. ¿Hay algo más racional y más nazi que Europa? Por encima de todo los nazis siempre defendieron la unidad europea. Por ejemplo, en 1940 el ministro de Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, propugnaba la creación de una “unidad económica europea a gran escala”, convencido de que “dentro de cincuenta años” los europeos ya no pensaríamos “en términos de países” sino continentales.
Inicialmente los proyectos nazis para la Unión Europea no sobrepasaron el papel, pero tras el desembarco de Normandía, el 10 de agosto de 1944 un grupo de dirigentes de las SS se reunieron en Estrasburgo, una ciudad en la frontera entre Francia y Alemania hoy conocida porque apesta a europeísmo con su tribunal y su gigantesca burocracia. Los nazis también se reunían en Estrasburgo porque siempre han sido los más europeístas de todos, y lo que preparaban entonces era precisamente el europeísmo de hoy.
Se reunieron en el Hotel Casa Roja y aunque las conversaciones eran secretas, el contenido de las mismas se conoce (1) gracias a un espía francés que participó en ellas e informó luego a los aliados. Ahora consta en los archivos con el nombre cifrado “EW PA-128″, o bien por el Informe Casa Roja, y se compone de tres páginas mecanografiadas.
En previsión de la inminente derrota, las SS diseñaban el papel de Alemania en la futura Unión Europea. Para ello debían estrechar los lazos con la “élite industrial” del III Reich a fin de reconstruir la economía alemana en la posguerra, preparar el retorno de los nazis al poder así como la creación de “un imperio alemán fuerte”. Entre esos industriales estaban Krupp, Volkswagen y Messerschmitt. En la reunión también participaron altos funcionarios de la Marina y del Ministerio de Armamento.
El general Eisenhower conoció el informe, que se envió por valija diplomática desde la Embajada estadounidense en Londres a Cordell Hull, Secretario de Estado de Roosvelt, quien lo clasificó entonces como uno de tantos proyectos descabellados de los nazis. Según el informe, los nazis planeaban reconstruir el III Reich bajo los auspicios de la integración económica europea. Pero mientras antes de la guerra Alemania se había tratado de imponer por la fuerza bruta, después de ella se debía imponer mediante el mercado, por el propio impulso económico del imperialismo alemán.
El plan de las SS consistía en colocar sus monopolios (BMW, Siemens, I.G. Farben) en el extranjero con diferentes marcas comerciales. Para ello durante años habían ido tejiendo una red de empresas fantasma a lo largo del mundo, especialmente en Estados Unidos. Tras la guerra los fondos retornarían a Alemania a través de Suiza para ayudar a reflotar el partido nazi. Uno de los artífices del plan era Hermann Abs, miembro de la dirección de Deutsche Bank entre 1938 y 1945 que, después de la II Guerra Mundial se convirtió en su presidente.
Abs formó parte de la junta supervisora de I.G. Farben, el monopolio químico que fabricó el gas Zyklon B que se usó en los campos de concentración y que era socio del monopolio petrolero estadounidese Standard Oil (2). Por encargo de las SS y con el apoyo del monopolio químico estadounidense, Dow Chemical, I.G. Farben había intentado hundir la producción estadounidense de manganeso, una materia prima estratégica para el blindaje de los carros de combate.
En 1945 en Nüremberg fueron condenados 24 dirigentes de I.G.Farben por cometer crímenes contra la humanidad y el tribunal ordenó desmantelar el consorcio, que se dividió en las tres conocidas multinacionales Hoechst, Bayer y BASF, un mero cambio de marca comercial. En 1955 Hoechst designó a Friedrich Jaehne, un criminal de guerra convicto en Nüremberg, como presidente de su Junta Directiva. Un año después Bayer nombró a Fritz ter Meer, otro criminal de guerra convicto, para el mismo cargo (3). La I.G.Farben renacía de sus cenizas y con ella los nazis.
En la posguerra Abs también tuvo un papel fundamental en la reconstrucción del monopolismo alemán y la Unión Europea. Fue el responsable de distribuir los fondos de Estados Unidos del Plan Marshall que fueron a parar a los nazis y monopolistas alemanes. Al mismo tiempo fue miembro de la Liga Europea de Cooperación Económica, un grupo de presión creado en 1946 para acelerar las políticas de integración europea.
Otro de los instrumentos a través de los cuales los nazis ejecutaron sus planes fue el Grupo Bilderberg, que en 1955 impulsó los principios fundamentales del mercado y la moneda común europeos. Hasta 2004 el Grupo Bilderberg estuvo presidido por el Príncipe Bernardo de Holanda, un antiguo oficial nazi.
Según el historiador Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, asesor de los antiguos trabajadores esclavos de los campos de concentración, “para muchas figuras importantes industriales cercanas al régimen nazi, Europa se convirtió en un pretexto para perseguir los intereses nacionales alemanes después de la derrota de Hitler […] La continuidad de la economía de Alemania y de las economías de la Europa de posguerra fue sorprendente. Algunas de las figuras principales de la economía nazi se convirtieron en dirigentes de los constructores de la Unión Europea”.
No entiendo por qué extraña tanto el progresivo ascenso de los nazis en Europa. Su ambiente natural es la Unión Europea. Lo raro son todos esos grupos que se llaman “de izquierda”, que se presentan a las elecciones europeas ocultando el origen y naturaleza nazi de las instituciones europeas. ¿No se encuentran un poco fuera de su ambiente natural? ¿O es que su ambiente es el mismo que el de los nazis?
Notas:
(1) The secret report that shows how the nazis planned a Fourth Reich… in the EU,https://archive.org/stream/Ew-pa128Report/Ew-pa128Report_djvu.txt
(2) Ervin Hexner: Cárteles internacionales, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1950, pgs.350-351, 370 a 375 y 598 y stes.
(3) Cornwell: Los científicos de Hitler. Ciencia, guerra y el pacto con el diablo, Paidós, Barcelona, 2005, pgs.64 y stes y 359 y stes.
Fuentes:
http://www.diario-octubre.com/2014/06/04/el-europeismo-es-fascismo/
Full text of «EW-Pa 128 report»
Revealed: The secret report that shows
how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich
…in the EU
By Adam Lebor
Last updated at 10:30 PM on 09th May 2009
The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military
Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November
1944.
The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret
meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi
officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany ‘s post-war
recovery, prepare for the Nazis’ return to power and work for a ‘strong German empire’.
In other words: the Fourth Reich.
Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed
company I. G. Farben
The three-page, closely typed report, marked ‘Secret’, copied to British officials and sent
by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists
were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany’s economy by sending money
through Switzerland.
They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until
conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.
The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt.
Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with
incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its
predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire – but not just German.
The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the
inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.
The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to
the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe . The
European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in
the last days of the Second World War.
But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had
become fact.
Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German
businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did
soon recover after 1945.
The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists
and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There
they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.
Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at
least, come to pass?
The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg
in 1944 – and it paints an extraordinary picture.
The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS
Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in
the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-
green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and
the room had been searched for microphones.
Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a
factory run by German firm I. G. Farben
There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise
that the war cannot be won, he declared. ‘It must take steps in preparation for a post-war
commercial campaign.’ Such defeatist talk was treasonous – enough to earn a visit to the
Gestapo’s cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.
But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was
at stake. He ordered the industrialists to ‘make contacts and alliances with foreign firms,
but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion’.
The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.
They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been
used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners
of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg- America Line shipping
company.
But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another
smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were
secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.
Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the
war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German
unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth
Reich.
In stage one, the industrialists were to ‘prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party,
which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis’, using the term for the French
resistance.
Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to
establish a ‘secure post-war foundation in foreign countries’, while ‘existing financial
reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can
be created after the defeat’.
In stage three, German businesses would set up a ‘sleeper’ network of agents abroad
through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence,
until the Nazis returned to power.
‘The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by
chiefs of the Nazi Party,’ Bosse announced.
‘Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong
enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their
effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.’
Enlarge
Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing ‘plans of German
industrialists to engage in underground activity’
The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in
Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per
cent commission.
The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.
Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the
treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from
Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign
currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.
Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied
intelligence.
The Red House Report’s author notes: ‘Previously, exports of capital by German
industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by
means of special influence.
‘Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves
by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party’s plans for its
post-war operations.’
The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the
summer of 1944 the law did not matter.
More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the
west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination
attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.
During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder
and murder, and they planned to keep it.
A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS,
according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction:
The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.
He says: ‘By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely
dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying
to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the
auspices of the apparatus of terror.’
Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.
As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941
and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.
A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for
the psychological welfare of his extermination squad’s gunmen: he ordered that several of
them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal
responsibility.
By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf s
ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS’s
massive pan-European economic empire after Germany’s defeat.
Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a
German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the
transition to a post-war economy after Germany’s defeat. This was dangerous, especially
as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.
But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service,
protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German
economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.
Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed
the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS’s
economic empire almost worthless.
The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a
stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly
occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to
introduce a currency that would have any value.
That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an
astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency,
Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.
The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires
across Europe.
War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 – despite six
years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments – the capital stock of
assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the
armaments boom.
Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered
European continent. The answer was through supranationalism – the voluntary surrender
of national sovereignty to an international body.
Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community
(ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational
organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common
market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady
erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.
But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be
pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the
American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists
convicted of war crimes.
The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and
Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-
Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.
Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used
slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.
The Krupp company soon became one of Europe’s leading industrial combines.
The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich
Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single
Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a
fortune of more than $lbillion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.
‘For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for
pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,’ says historian Dr Michael
Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.
‘The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is
striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the
European Union.’
Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW,
Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the VI rocket.
Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps
were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with
the SS officers overseeing the camps.
Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany’s most powerful banker, had
prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of
Deutsche Bank, Germany’s biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded,
Deutsche Bank enthusiastically Aryanised’ Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were
owned by Jews.
By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the
Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche
Bank’s wealth had quadrupled.
Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G Farben, as Deutsche Bank’s representative.
I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany’s most powerful companies, formed out of a union
of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.
It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp
at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other
prisoners died producing artificial rubber.
When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis’ chilling
term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent
for which was owned by I.G. Farben.
But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben’s bosses hedged their bets.
During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard’s research. After the war, 24
I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III – but only twelve
of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to
eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.
Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany’s post-war reconstruction. It was
largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a ‘strong German
empire’ was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today’s European Union.
Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid – reconstruction funds – to German
industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany’s economic recovery.
Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation,
an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the
establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.
Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are
strikingly familiar today – on monetary integration and common transport, energy and
welfare systems.
When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs
was his most important financial adviser.
Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute
itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.
That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up
the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established
increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and
European Commission.
Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard
Germany’s first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as
Chancellor for three years.
But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe – was built on
mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by
German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.
Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a
conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There
was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.
A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer
5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any
further legal action.
To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of
£1.8billion.
Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election
in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again
home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.
But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph
Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda chief, once said: In 50 years’ time nobody will think of
nation states.’
For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that
today’s drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of
the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich – an economic rather than military
imperium.
• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor’s thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is
published by Reportage Press.